Not to belabour the point too much, but I think it's important for people to know. If they feel they were wrongly targeted, because they weren't in the area, I'm just trying to figure out what the process would look like for them, not only to have their account unfrozen but.... Are there any extant frozen accounts from the use of the Emergencies Act? I have to believe there aren't, because the emergency period has come to an end.
What documentation do people have in order to be able to say, “My account was frozen because someone believed that I was in the Ottawa area during that time. I was not in the area during that time, so my account was improperly frozen”? If they are seeking some kind of remedy or redress for that, on what basis would they do that? What kind of documentation would they have?
A phone call is one thing. They call the bank and say, “I was never in the Ottawa area. Unfreeze my account.” The bank talks to you guys, and the account is unfrozen. However, in the event that there was some kind of timely transaction they weren't able to make because their account was frozen and they want to seek a remedy, what kind of documentation can they expect to get to help them in their effort to pursue that question with the courts?