Yes, maybe clarity. In this case, the measures were not implemented for a long period of time, but in a case where they would have been, once something is seized or frozen by the financial institution, what exactly is supposed to be happening? Like I said, we maintained communication with the banks on a daily basis, and a lot of questions we didn't have...because we were not in [Inaudible--Editor] law, we would refer the banks back to their general counsel. For example, on seizing the shares of a company, which fluctuate, or things like that, what exactly are the banks supposed to do with that? The clarity is more on the bank, and maybe the previous speaker pointed to that at times.