Sure.
I think it's helpful to distinguish the freezing of accounts from the blocking of money movement and crypto movement to fund the activities. We did find it generally more straightforward to identify Bitcoin addresses that were associated with fundraisers and to block transactions to those addresses.
I think we focused our efforts, frankly, on that dimension of the emergency order, which was more with respect to money moving to fundraisers, rather than trying to focus specifically on particular individuals, given the breadth of that definition.