Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to quantify the amount. The intelligence we provide, in many cases, is based on suspicions that are identified by the reporting entities. They, in fact, are the ones that identify a level of suspicion. They submit a suspicious transaction to us. If it meets our threshold and we suspect it may be relevant to a money laundering or terrorist financing investigation, then we will disclose the STR—the suspicious transaction report—and/or other related transactions to law enforcement or our national security agencies for investigation.
What we provide is intelligence; it's not actually evidence. Our intelligence becomes one part of an investigative puzzle. It's really only at the end of that investigation or throughout that investigation by law enforcement that they would actually be able to identify whether, in fact, it was fraud that was committed, or if it was perhaps a misinterpretation of the way the money was coming in, or who was assisting family members or whatever the case may be. The fact that we do disclosures—and we've done many disclosures—may or may not result in fraud charges. It's not because I disclose that it's definitely fraud. We're disclosing simply because we suspect that the intelligence we have would be relevant to a money laundering or terrorist financing investigation if one were undertaken.