Yes. It's an interesting question, because, again, it goes back to this idea that having different accountability is less accountability. That is simply not true.
What we're looking to see is saying that organizations who want to work with non-qualified donees must do so in furtherance of their charitable purpose. Both Bill S-216 and the amendments we're providing to the BIA create a system where that takes place. There's not less documentation. There's not less accountability. There are appropriate accountability measures that speak to the unique partnership and relationship set up with the non-qualified donee. CRA would play its role in ensuring that those are observed.
Charities want to do their good work in furtherance of their charitable purpose. They're not looking to step outside. What we're suggesting is a system that preserves the ability to have innovative programming and to also have trust and confidence that the accountability measures are in place.