Thank you for the question, but I'm not altogether sure how that would play out. Quite frankly, I think that the intent behind this reform was.... I don't think there was a problem. I think that there was a general agreement on what the problems to solve were and the vision of what should be created instead.
This was in 2019. We're in 2022. A lot has happened between then and now. I think the actual writing down of that vision does not correspond to what it was.
To answer a bit more directly, I feel like this is not a contentious issue. I think it's a matter of tweaking and going back to the original intent. This is what makes me confident that if we had this in committee, I think we would all agree on what needs to be done and avoid voting into law something that might be faulty for the reasons I've evoked.