Thank you very much.
It's one thing to talk about the legal semantics of direction and control and own activities, but I think it's important to also draw people's attention to the fact that this has real-world consequences. If in fact you're able to get through your amendments that will reduce the amount of burden and paperwork, and really the legal fiction that own activities has created, that will result in, to put it simply, more good being done. Girls who wouldn't be able to access education will get it, children who are hungry will get more food and indigenous and other unique populations will be given more opportunities if we are able to get your amendments through.
Is that your testimony? Is that a fair characterization?