You're absolutely right. At the outset, we were told that a reform was planned. We were also told that the tripartite structure would return to the way it was before. That's not what's being proposed now. We believe there is a problem with it, and that's why we're asking questions.
The analysis needs to be done elsewhere. There's a reason why consideration was being given to returning to the former way of doing things, and that's what we would like to study. We think that this needs to be done somewhere other than in the study of this bill. That would be the best way to proceed. As you pointed out, it's too specialized.
And although a promise was made, it has not yet been kept.