Yes, I ran out of time earlier too.
We're afraid of the distinction that's being made between part-time and full-time judges. Under the bill, full-time judges would be compensated in such a way that they would be considered members of the public service. The part-time people might have less privileged access to information and training. We feel that creates a distinction that should not exist. If we want to create a board of appeal that's operational and autonomous and in which all members are fully involved, no distinction should be drawn based on their employment status.
To answer your question, yes, I think it's clearly unfair.