I've been further advised by colleagues at Justice that both motions are also incomplete.
BQ-4 is trying to amend clause 131, but it should actually amend both clause 131 and clause 132.
It's the same thing with CPC-5. It is trying to amend clause 133, but it actually means to amend clause 131 and clause 132.
I don't know procedurally what it means if the motion is incomplete on the committee's end, but this is what I've been advised.