My comment ties in with what Mr. Albas said, Mr. Chair.
We are studying a mammoth bill that is more than 400 pages long. We have to vote on 502 clauses, on top of the schedules. The fact that procedure prevents us from discussing an amendment that we should be able to debate all because it mistakenly refers to the wrong clause is truly appalling.
As far as the committee is concerned, this is really creating a negative work atmosphere. Members can support the amendment or vote against it. That's not the problem. They should at the very least have the opportunity to debate it. All because the amendment is one clause off, we won't ever be able to discuss it. This will have serious consequences for small wine producers.
I repeat, this is truly appalling, and I want you and my fellow members to know that, Mr. Chair. I am really not happy with what's happening right now.