Our position would be that those assets are not to be used or are available for government and for pensioners.
This may be a more of a general question. Large and passive ETFs now control a significant number of voting securities and publicly traded securities across the world, but in particular in North American markets.
Do you believe these ETFs should continue to have the ability to vote at shareholder meetings and exercise a significant amount of influence? I'm thinking about some of the political influence, or the political winds that sometimes blow, that these large ETFs can now implement on corporate entities across North America.