It's really complicated.
For simplification, the new purchaser wouldn't take over the entire responsibility. They agreed to put a stream of funding into it. If Stelco made over a certain percentage of profit, the pensions were given a stream out of that. They were also given a percentage of the land and facilities. All of that went in.
This allowed the people running the plan to keep it fairly stable, but they had this new money coming in to build it up. If you don't have a source for that money, as with the Sears situation, then you have the risk of.... Who is going to handle the risk and be responsible for it? The person running the plans can say, “I have no money coming in, so I can't take any risk”, and it's not going to grow. That's where you run into....
I also want to make the point that, at least as of last week, one of the Stelco pensions has not been annuitized and it's still under that program. That's the Stelco salary plan in the Lake Erie Works. Again, that's a member of my organization.