It is possible that the CRA could adopt the same regulation as is identified in Bill C-19 as a way of interpreting what's in Bill C-241.
In terms of minimum required distance, I think that one's pretty straightforward. There is a slight difference in the distance, but we're talking about a 30-kilometre difference.
Another main characteristic is the distance calculation method. In the table, it says that, under the existing law, it's calculated on the one hand between the ordinary residence and each temporary work location or, on the other hand, between each temporary lodging and each temporary work location, whereas in Bill C-241 it's calculated between the ordinary place of residence and the job site.
Are there any practical implications for those differences?