I certainly hear that we're a ways away from that, and I think that was the answer, by and large, that we got very clearly from the PBO, but I wanted to assess the promise of this climate scenario analysis for perhaps being able to deliver that, because I think—and I'm not proposing that this is a problem for you to solve, and certainly not here at the table today—the problem is that it would be difficult to have an honest debate with Canadians about the impact of carbon pricing, because the analyses will be skewed against carbon pricing as long as we can quantify indirect costs to consumers without being able to quantify indirect benefits. There is a structural deficit in the empirical side of the argument that's going to favour arguments against carbon pricing until we can quantify potential indirect benefits to consumers.
Partly I just want to note that, and I want to take away from this conversation—correct me if I'm wrong—that there is some promise in the work that you're requiring companies to do, or strongly suggesting that companies do, as a regulator, that we might actually be able to one day quantify those indirect benefits once this raw information is more readily available and more readily understood by various actors in the economy.