I certainly hope those forecasts are right, but I think there will remain a philosophical question about the prudence of automatic escalators with respect to the excise tax.
I want to ask you this: There are some changes proposed for the air passenger bill of rights. This would be at least the second iteration, I think—certainly with respect to the government, although even more so with respect to bills presented by members of Parliament around air passenger rights. There has been a fair bit of criticism already of the proposed changes in this act. I know my colleague Taylor Bachrach has done some good work on this file. I think part of what's at issue is that some of the terminology in the proposed changes is vague and leaves a lot to government regulation, as opposed to legislation, in a context where folks felt the government's first shot at an air passenger bill of rights was inadequate.
I'm wondering about openness to considering changes to what's proposed in the act, specifically on the question of being a little more clear in the legislation itself regarding how this is meant to be implemented and what some of the criteria are that Canadians can expect to be laid out transparently, in terms of what their rights are.