As I said, they're similar to the executive compensation amounts, except that they go backwards. My understanding for executive compensation is that any amount that was payed out in executive compensation from the go-forward date would be repaid to government from the amount they took in wage subsidy.
The idea is that it would be happening on a go-forward basis. If you received a certain amount, call it x, and then you payed out an executive compensation amount y, you would be paying that back to the government because it was obviously something that wasn't required in your budget.
The idea is that this would be true for dividends on a go-forward basis but that we would also go backwards and say that if you were able to pay out $100,000,000 in dividends to your shareholders, that was $100,000,000 of wage subsidy that you did not require. That would mean that they would have to find that money elsewhere, either in cash holdings or in the market. It's our opinion that companies that were able to pay out that kind of dividend in these circumstances will be able to find a way to pay that money back and therefore don't need to continue to benefit from public funds in that amount.