Okay, in order to have two votes that are going to be consistent with each other by virtue of the clock, we need to vote on Mr. McLean's original language anyway.
In that case, I think consistency would be better than inconsistency, and we should probably go ahead with a vote on Mr. McLean's language.
What we are told is that we could vote on amendment NDP‑3 as written, but that the wording of amendment NDP‑4 would be different. So if we were to pass NDP‑3, that would be problematic, because NDP‑4 would be worded differently from NDP‑3.