With respect to trying to support the amendment here, if I can, I'll ask Mr. Blaikie this. There are certain entities, of course, that required funding under CEWS to keep their employees during a period when there was no income coming in, and that have subsequently obviously turned their fortunes around but would not have survived had they not had the support from government during a very trying time at the beginning of the pandemic.
If the intent is only to use it on a go-forward basis when companies were solvent and still may have been trying to access government programs, I think that intent is clear, and I think it's clearly supportable, but if those programs had not been there at a certain point in time, those companies would not exist now and we'd be more beholden to foreign companies doing that work.
If we can clarify that in the language and in the intent, I think you'd get a good amount of support from around the table.