Mr. McGowan, before you or someone else within the finance department answers my second question, I just want to be clear. I like putting things into plain language. I always have to put things into terms I understand. My understanding of your first point is that there's a legitimate reason why a number of corporations might move money around. It would be seen as dividends moving around, but it has nothing to do with giving dividends.
The intention of this amendment is to say that if there are dividends given out to shareholders, that company should not be receiving the wage subsidy. You're saying there are legitimate reasons to move dividends within companies. That's a normal course of business and they do it for a number of different reasons in an everyday way. That's the first part.
For the second part, you're saying there are some technical things that the CRA might have to change if this amendment passes, and we don't quite know how easy it would be for the CRA to do that.