Thank you for that.
I understand that it might very well make CRA's life easier, but I'm not in the business of making CRA's life easier. I'm in the business of making life easier for Canadians. Don't you think it will be more difficult for tax professionals and small business owners if in fact a vehicle is received, in this situation, that's being used in their employment? Would they not, to mix metaphors, be looking in their rear-view window to see if CRA is going to come after them? What ability do they have to say that company B, or even individual B, is just providing this vehicle that happens to be used in employment?