I'm glad for that. Thank you. That's good to hear.
My question, though, is about the genesis between these two provisions: the one reassessing the banks with respect to GST and HST on credit card charges, if I have that correct, and this one, which is also from a case situation where the CRA lost again, this time with respect to automobile standby charges. One is made retroactive and one is not.
I agree with you that for the vast majority of the time—in fact, I can't think of another time, but maybe you could enlighten me—it's always prospective, not retroactive. In the banks case, what was different from the automobile standby charge?