I think a disclosure in a national sustainability standards board will bring that cohesiveness globally. It will take time but it's starting. On taxonomy there's a notion of how they would work together or interoperability. These are based on some of the key assumptions, which are the absolute imperative of alignment to 1.5°C as well as the principle to do no significant harm. We don't jeopardize other environmental objectives, for example, for emissions reductions. Then there are technical matters, the way that you structure it.
As part of the research, we spoke with the Climate Bonds Initiative as well as with people in Australia and Asia. I would say that we are falling very much in line with the global standards around green..., and there's a very big appetite to work together to help with the global definition of transition. That's why we thought it was incredibly important that we consult with them during the process to make sure that they are aligned and supportive of our direction.