Thank you.
Now I'm going to turn to Mr. Stewart, of Greenpeace Canada.
An awful lot of hope is being pinned on carbon capture, it seems. As I see it, we have two options. Carbon capture technology can provide some hope once we're near the finish line and we have just a few really troublesome tonnes to go. The other option, which seems to be the one Canada has chosen, is to adopt carbon capture as an industrial policy that will allow us not to change the industry, not to undertake a transition, while making it look as though a transition is under way.
I understand all the nuances, and I truly commend the taxonomy work that's been done. However, the ambiguity around that taxonomy could strengthen Canada's approach of increasing oil production while making people think emissions are being reduced.
Do you think that's the wrong approach?