I have a taken a close look at the bill. I think the bill's focus is more broadly based than the taxonomy recommendations that are specific to the implementation of a taxonomy framework for the country, whereas the bill in the Senate is looking at broader engagement and a legislative regime that would more extensively call into play the regulatory and legislative requirements associated with the broader workings of the financial industry.
I would make a very clear distinction between what we are suggesting is a taxonomy framework that would be implemented versus the much broader and more inclusive expectations that the bill would require.