Thank you very much. That's a really good, thorough answer, I think.
Ms. Bardswick and Ms. Zvan, I'll go back to you two because I'm interested in your three-tier governance model, which I think is perhaps a shift from how SFAC has operated to date. I'm interested in how this helps us keep the taxonomy moving.
I note that, in your report on the road map, you've identified that what counts as a transition investment today won't necessarily count in five to 10 years from now. The fact that it will change to keep us on the 1.5°C commitment that we have is really important. It's important that we include climate science and other stakeholders in those discussions, and that, as those debates unfold, those decisions are made together. Can you maybe describe in a bit more detail about why that governance model the way you've structured it is so important?