We're now on the main motion. I would like to present an amendment, which has two deletions.
The first is in (d), where I would suggest deleting “weak rules on”, which doesn't affect the substance of the study but is more of a value statement about the rules. We may all agree, at the end of it, that they're too weak, and that's fine, but I'd like to delete “weak rules on”.
Second, I would like to delete “and inviting white-collar crime into Canada”, which is later in the motion.... Actually, it's still in (d). Again, I don't think anyone is intentionally inviting white-collar crime into Canada. The rules may allow for it to happen too frequently, and we may all agree on that, but I think that's more loaded language. I would like to preserve fairly objective language in the actual motion that doesn't affect the substance of the study. I hope that members, in the spirit of collaboration, which I think that we've achieved here in this committee, would vote those changes through.