But I think the procedural question is whether in camera testimony that this committee heard is also the property of future committees. If it is, then we shouldn't destroy it. If it isn't, then we have the option to do so.
I think this motion, as amended, wouldn't preclude the committee deciding to destroy the evidence, say at the end of a session. We could still fight that out later if we think there was something we heard in the session that we don't feel comfortable passing on to future generations of fisheries committees. We could entertain a motion at that time, I think.