In terms of your first question, on icebreaking fees, yes, they are one component of the overall issue of marine service fee, which I mentioned and Minister Hearn indicated. He has begun a process with the shipping industry to review marine service fees in general, which include icebreaking fees.
In terms of the status of our multi-year planning, I'm not in a position to give you any figures today, because we're still working on the best mix of options. What I would say is that one of my objectives is to try to see if we can get a commitment to study ongoing investment in the coast guard and particularly in the fleet.
If memory serves me well, the coast guard received something like 45 or 46 vessels in the 1980s. Since then, it has not received any large vessels, and in the intervening 25 years has received around 40 new small vessels. It's very difficult, as anyone can appreciate, if you're making investments in fits and starts. This creates considerable downstream pressures, which are what we're facing now with the aging of our large fleet. I'd like to have a plan where we make steady, ongoing investments in a paced way over time, so we don't find ourselves with a lot of vessels toward the end of their life span, which is what we have now in the large fleet.