Mr. Lunney, Mr. Stoffer's motion has been properly put to the committee in both official languages, with advance notice. After a discussion with the clerk, my interpretation is that what Mr. Blais is doing is really a separate motion. It's really not an amendment to Mr. Stoffer's motion. That's the clerk's advice to me as vice-chair.
I don't see that we have any choice, but I'm again guided by the wishes of the committee that we deal with Mr. Stoffer's motion today, since it is in order. He gave adequate notice, and I think we have to deal with this motion. Whether or not we entertain notice of another motion by Mr. Blais is what we have to decide today.