There is a series of ten principles, and we could send the committee a copy of the documentation. Essentially, they're not allowed to increase overall capacity, they're not allowed to create more need for fish, they're not allowed to do a number of things. Some of these are in our deck. The difficulty was that this would require their going to an IQ or an ITQ or some kind of fishery of that nature.
As I mentioned earlier, we have a disincentive for doing that, because our licence fee structure is such that it's cheaper to buy a licence for a competitive fishery than it is to buy one for an IQ or an ITQ fishery.
They didn't want to make the change, and they're running those informal systems I described earlier to achieve the same outcome but without getting the cost. But that didn't allow us to move ahead with changes to the vessel replacement rules, and there's just been a lot of inertia. They didn't want to make the fundamental changes in how the fishery was managed.
I think that's now coming to an end, since we are forced, given the economic performance of the fisheries right now in light of the global macro-economics, to take a look at all of these issues.