Where you have a competitive fishery, where there is no individual limit, and the amount of fish being caught by an enterprise is open within the constraints of the fishing plan and the TAC, then what you would have in the case of no limits on capacity is an increase in capacity that will eventually have an impact on conservation. Clearly, if you have an individual quota, that can take the place of observers, dockside monitors, and vessel monitoring systems. But if you don't have some limit, and you allow open-ended capitalization, you'll end up with people who are economically stressed. We have that already within the constraints. We see it in some of the lobster fisheries, where people are putting in such large boats that they are now pressed to catch every pound of fish they possibly can in order to pay the bills.
Fishermen will, by nature, not go bankrupt before they push the envelope on compliance. If you allow open-ended investment, and they can't make enough money legally to pay for those investments, and they have to pay bills, they'll do whatever they have to do to deal with that. And that may mean that there's a compromise on conservation at some point.