Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I appreciate that answer. When I first entertained this discussion, I thought you were talking about a standardized booklet on stability, a one-size-fits-all, but what I am hearing here is you are talking about a booklet with standardized features but specific information for a particular vessel.
The quick question I have goes back to the incident related by Mr. Manning, I believe, where a fisherman lost his vessel mid-season and his replacement vessel was two and a half feet too long or something, and he had to saw off a few feet in order to fish his last few weeks. When we establish regulations, is there going to be some flexibility or latitude for recognizing circumstances? In zoning in a municipal environment we have “legal non-conforming”. You might allow somebody to finish his season with a non-conforming vessel that's not dangerous but would allow him to at least complete his season. Could you allow a little bit of flexibility in there, an escape clause, for unusual circumstances?