No, I don't think so. First of all, it took three years, that's correct. But it took three years because, first of all, it's complicated. Second, it's controversial, and third, we really wanted to work with all the participants to bring them along in the journey from where we were to where we needed to go in the future, and that took time.
We also wanted, to the extent it was possible, to have as many participants as possible outside the usual commercial fishing interests. That included the communities, for example, on the west coast of Vancouver Island. It included NGOs, recreational fishermen, and first nations.
So the process did take time. Yes, that's true. But we think it was time well spent, because we think the result is comprehensive. It is admittedly complicated, but it has the potential to really address the problems that were present prior to 2003 and to be durable. In other words, this could be a sustainable approach that would allow the groundfish fishery to go forward for the long term, we hope.