Exactly. As I described at the outset--and forgive me for taking so much time--unless you know the ecosystem, it's hard to understand what the fate of contamination is.
I've been a marine biologist for 29 years, and I've worked in a variety of institutions. In the Baie des Chaleurs, we have this unique situation. With the contaminants that are either deposited directly from effluent pipes or from stacks in the area, essentially most of that pollution stays, because of this unique oceanographic feature. It's right at the mouth of the bay in the Paspébiac area. Whatever goes into the bay stays in the bay. Over time, as various government agencies have reported, there is this accumulation of contaminants in the sediment in the water and, in turn, in the species. So right now we're saying that the pollution burden in this ecosystem is enough. We don't need one more gram of whatever contaminant could be coming into that.
There are certain things we cannot control, such as long-range transport from the United States, but we can control what happens on our shores. Whatever industries we want to site there, we must start thinking about atmospheric deposition dispersion and deposition into the marine environment.