Basically, I'm into a multi-species vessel, and yes, it causes some problems with stability when you're changing gear completely. But when you're capped on the length of your vessel, that's where you run into problems. You can make them wider, you can make them deeper, but you're capped with your length. So probably if I could go 20 feet longer and have a boat that's not quite as wide and not as deep and not as high, I mean, that vessel would probably meet vast stability booklets to pursue the fishery I want to pursue. But at her size, and when I'm capped in the length, you run into a problem.
It's a rule of thumb in the fishing industry. I understood that you should never go any more than one-third of the length of your boat in your width. That's the max. And when we're building boats 30 feet wide and 65 long, we've gone way beyond proportions.
So I would suggest the length of the vessel.... At that time, you probably will be able to start constructing vessels that will meet stability tests. I maintain that the problem with stability is in the bulk of the boat, the way it's constructed. You'll probably end up with the same carrying volume as the guy who has the 65-foot 11-inch boat that is built 30 feet wide. If he built himself an 80, that could probably be a 90-foot boat at 30-feet wide. And at that point, she's probably a very stable boat.