Jean-Claude, that's one of the things about tourism. I'm not here to stir up the pot either, and it seems to me you've done a very solid job of balancing the consumptive aspects of the industry with the non-consumptive aspects of the industry. There have been proposals put forward by the IFAW and others to comb seals and manufacture products out of the fur that comes from the comb--absolute nonsense. The Magdalen Islands have built up a tourism industry in many respects, in the pre-season, but then by graphically showing these non-factual images of a whitecoat hunt, they're the ones that actually are the cause of the demise of the tourism aspect.
This area is the same as my area. It always enjoyed the economic and social benefits of sealing. We've had the protesters come in. They marginalized the economic benefits of sealing. Then we went increasingly to tourism. Now they're trying to marginalize the tourism aspects of the industry. The truth is--believe me, in my own riding, tourism is very important and I'm a big supporter of it--if tourism was the best industry around, the richest places on the planet should be Jamaica and the Dominican Republic, but it's not, because you need a balance of many industries in order to make a solid economy.
Where do we go from here in terms of counterbalancing the impact of groups like the IFAW? How do we actually continue to stimulate the industry? Do we fight fire with fire? Do we fight with emotion? Give us, for our report, how we do this in terms of taking on this issue.