From my perspective, the major problem with our interchange with DFO and co-management is that the policies we have set in place are all open-ended. There's no finite time on them. There's no requirement to review them. I firmly believe that any policy you put in place should have a mandatory review at some point in time so that you can force changes to happen where they have to happen.
Right now we have a sports priority access that is absolutely killing the commercial fishery. We can't effect any change, because that's the policy. That's what we're told: that's the policy. In terms of the allocation within the commercial sector itself, every single user group admits that it's broken, that it doesn't work, but that's the policy.
We're having great difficulty ourselves, within the commercial sector, changing that policy and agreeing on what it should be. Even though we all agree it's broken, somebody is going to have to give something up to change it, and that's a very difficult thing.
So I think you have to have these things forced upon you at some point in time. The SARA legislation is killing us, but at least when they put it in there they put in a forced review period at the end of five years. Every piece of legislation should have that. Every policy should have that.
I hope that answers your question.