Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I thank Mr. Gagnon for his presentation.
I've dealt with Seawatch Inc. in Newfoundland, who have provided this service to Newfoundland and Labrador since 1981. I'm very concerned about the integrity of the program, with the plans that are being put forward by government, for the simple reason that, as they would say in my neck of the woods, it may be a possible case of hiring the fox to watch out for the chickens. That's not the way we need to conserve our industry.
At the same time, the concern this raises is the cost of providing the service and the cost that goes back to the pockets of the fishermen. My question is, how does your company, or how do the companies involved here, reduce that cost to fishermen?
Right now in my area the continuous increase in fees associated with participating in the fishing industry is a big issue. If this program is revamped to go forward under the present plan of government, as I understand it, the fees will be passed over to the people in the industry once again. That's the concern I have, and I'd like you to address it.
Also, I would like you to address the question of the competition factor—you somewhat answered this with my colleague—among the companies involved in providing the service today. I'd like to know if you could give some indication of what the observer program was costing, say, five years ago compared with what it costs today. Even though I don't support the change to the program—I want to lay that out front, that I don't—I am concerned about the estimated cost of providing the program, from your company's perspective.
I'd like you to address those couple of issues, if you could, please.