No, I don't think that was the question. It was not about seeking approval; it was about informing the committee, which was conducting a very serious study on the very serious issues of vessel safety, boat replacement, vessel length. At the time that we were conducting a very serious study, obviously Transport Canada and DFO were both in collaboration and discussions in an effort to work together on this. That was contrary to the testimony we were hearing, or at the very least to the spirit of the testimony at the time.
Notwithstanding the fact that you have obviously been involved in many memorandums of understanding, you didn't feel, at the time when a standing committee of the House of Commons was conducting a very serious study on this issue, that you had an obligation or consideration to bring the information that was actually in play and in existence at the time?