Thank you, Dr. Rangeley. Maybe another time I could try to explain to you why we took the position we did on that, but I won't try to do that here.
There are just a couple of areas on which I'd like a little more clarification.
If we had 10% of our ocean area in MPAs, and let's say we had met our target by 2012, does your organization have any calculation on how much less fishing would be taking place by Canadian interests, let's say? I think I've heard you say both things, that industry is going to love it because there will be recovery of stocks. But are they actually going to fish less? Are there going to be all kinds of areas now where no fishing is allowed and fishermen are going to be affected by this? I'm not saying whether that's a good thing or a bad thing. I just want to know if, in your opinion, they will be.