I'm sure you do, Mr. Lunney.
Perhaps before we go to our final questioner, I'll have one very quick question. Maybe it's more of a comment.
Many of us at the table looked at the northern cod recovery, and we made a recommendation from this very committee that there be a food fishery or a recreational fishery, if you will, in the Trinity Bay area of Newfoundland. We did that based on what we thought at the time. It looked as if that was a separate stock from the Nose and Tail of the Grand Banks. There's a lot of argument to say that those cod probably, if they come from anywhere, come from the Hamilton Bank. There was certainly a lot more cod on the inshore in those bays than there had been in past years, even though we weren't seeing cod in other places.
So I respect what you're saying, but for the committee, when we made that recommendation, we looked at it on the basis that there's such a separation between science and the people on the shore. We needed to get some buy-in, and we did believe we could make that recommendation, which the minister ended up accepting, based on no further degradation of the stocks, that at least that small fishery was sustainable.