Since I've let both of you go considerably over time, I just have to take some time for a point of clarification, but first a statement.
There was a veterinarian report back in the 1960s and 1970s by two American veterinarians who observed the hunt for years. I'm struggling to remember their names; I have the literature at home, and I can certainly get it. Back in the days when the hunt wasn't as regulated as it is now, they said that 99% of the seals were killed instantly and humanely, and died, I believe—I'm not a veterinarian—of severe cranial brain hemorrhage. That would have been in the days when the hunt was much more wide open than it is today.
On the question of a humane hunt, obviously part of the issue for the humaneness of the hunt is the short window of time that sealers have to actually capture their seals. Would you agree, then, just simply based on the humaneness of the hunt, that we could improve the hunt—and I'm not saying I agree with your statements at all—if we had more time, if we had a larger window of time for sealers to actually fill their quotas, instead of having this rush to fill their quota?