As you know, our policy is that once a harbour has been divested, we stop providing a support unit to that harbour. This is a policy. In the last several months we've been looking at the situation and we are aware that there are several active commercial fishing communities across the country where we're not providing support at the moment, and this is a concern, of course, for the program because we're providing support elsewhere and not at those sites.
So we are thinking of maybe doing something about this, but for the time being the policy has not changed; the policy is that we don't provide support to a divested harbour. The rationale for this policy is that we don't have enough funding to support our own facility, so if we were to start diverting some funding towards these harbours that were divested some years ago, this would add some pressure on an insufficient budget. That is the situation.
We are also aware that there have been some requests that the training we provide now to harbour authorities should be also provided to these other communities where a harbour has been divested. I know, for instance, that in your area, the Coastal Communities Network, in its latest report, has come up with this recommendation that maybe the training we're providing to our own harbour authority could be extended to these other communities. This is definitely something we are examining at the moment, but no decision has been taken with respect to that.