I think that would prove very worth while.
Let me go back. The fishing industry and where the harvesters have to go to harvest the stock is fluid. A lot of the times they'll go farther offshore. It changes. The industry changes. Is there enough latitude in the program so that you can go back and assess?
We've seen an increase in commercial viability in one particular harbour, and again, I think if they had to do it over again, they would not have divested this particular harbour because it's on an elongated stretch of coast and it's a safe harbour.
Is there latitude to go back? Has it been done before, where you've gone back and re-engaged a harbour? Do you know a case of that?