I have two minutes and two questions. It's tough.
I wanted to draw attention to the section starting with paragraphs 4.55 to 4.65. You're dealing with navigational aids, and you draw out that during the budget process there the financial savings the coast guard proposed were not realistic. They talked about $15 million in savings by reducing traditional aids, and yet we recognize that not everybody is equipped to use modern aids. So foghorns, lighthouses, and buoys are still very important on a coast, especially where we are. We have a lot of people who aren't professional navigators out there.
I'd like to know that we have a realistic plan to maintain all of the aids that are going to be necessary, the modern ones that we're moving towards but also the traditional ones that others depend on. Do we have a plan to get there?
My second point would be on the lighthouses, the heritage situation. We have a bill proposed by Senator Carney now to deal with the heritage aspect of lighthouses. Has anybody considered using lighthouses as bed and breakfasts and letting them become revenue-generating, to justify maintaining a presence there for search and rescue by having some revenue generating? And maybe it could be transferred to Heritage Canada, or Parks Canada, or somebody else, with the assistance of the coast guard to maintain them.
There are two questions.