I think, Mr. Chairman, if you look at paragraph 4.78, we talk about the vessel replacement plan at the time we did the audit. And there were two or three issues that we note there. One is that the coast guard had asked for ten new vessels and had approval to get six. Of the six it did get, the timeframes were stretched out in terms of delivery. The long-term plan talked about replacing vessels several years after their expected useful life, so they were going to be very old when they had to be replaced.
Another issue that's tied in with this goes back to the issue of marine aids modernization. In terms of things like the large buoy tenders, the nature of the infrastructure that you have to maintain will drive the type of vessel you need. So as marine aids modernization has not progressed as rapidly as expected, you need to have the new, modern aids system in place before you can make clear decisions as to the type of vessel you're going to need to service those aids. Those are the types of things we talked about.
I do note in the document, which I think has been tabled, that the coast guard indicates that it updated that plan earlier this year, since July.
Those were the kinds of concerns we had when we did our audit work.