Some could read this as saying there's a cash crunch. I think we also note in a number of examples that for many years we've been talking about shore-based support; we believe there are efficiencies in that. When you look at some of the case studies, the repairs were much more expensive than they should have been.
There was also spending that, quite frankly, could have been better, and if there had been better maintenance procedures and so on, the costs maybe wouldn't have been what they were. So it's very hard to say that it's only a question of needing more money. It really comes back, again, to setting the priorities, determining what has to be done, and taking into account that limited funding has been given to this organization.