Clearly, the track report of NAFO over the last 20 years would lead one to be suspicious. But the process that was agreed to last year was that you could object, and then you start a process. Now that process has timelines in it; therefore, by the time it's finished, there will be a relatively small window available to the objecting party to actually fish, because he must object after the meeting but before the fishing is allowed to start. The start of the fishing season in NAFO is January 1. So the whole process kicks in prior to the start of fishing, and it has a short enough timeline that the fishing can't proceed to any great extent while the process is under way, because it's short.
On March 20th, 2007. See this statement in context.