We reviewed this, and there are about 170 fisheries that had some kind of use of fish involvement, and that would include everything from test fisheries on the west coast for salmon, to sentinel fisheries, to arrangements that were used to fund science and other activities. We've set up a policy to review all of those 170 fisheries relevant to the budget that we received. We are making allocation decisions based on conservation coming first and what's in the greater public good. If it ends up being something that is supporting an individual benefit, or a benefit to individual groups of fishermen, then those become lower down on the priority list.
We'll be going out to consult with the fishing industry on the policy that surrounds these decisions to ensure they have input and understand what is in place. We have had to make decisions, though, as we've opened up fisheries throughout the country relevant to what gets funded and what doesn't get funded using this policy. It's not the ideal, where you usually take time to develop it in consultation with industry. We had to come up with a tool to use in making decisions on how to allocate the money and how to be fair to fishing interests. We'll take that out, and these decisions can be reviewed once we've had input from the industry.